For those interested in workforce-related issues, such as certification, the press has not been quiet. A recent article by Joseph Conn described where things with a focus on physician certification, while another article by Bruce Bollag describes the ONC workforce funding initiatives in more detail.
In the meantime, a number of groups have put forth thoughtful critiques of the interim rules for meaningful use. The entirety of comments can be seen at Regulations.gov. It will be interesting to see how ONC and CMS take these into account and what modifications they make. Here are some published letters from some of the more prominent organizations:
- A group of 96 physician associations
- American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) comments on the CMS NPRM and ONC IFR
- American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA)
- Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) comments on the CMS NPRM and ONC IFR
- Consumer Partnership for eHealth
- eHealth Initiative
- American Hospital Association
- American Academy of Family Physicians
- Premier (insurance group purchaser)
- Medical Group Management Association
- HIMSS EHR (Vendor) Association comments on the CMS NPRM and ONC IFR
- Combined comments from the Markle Foundation, the Center for American Progress, and the Engelberg Center for Healthcare Reform of the Brookings Institute on the CMS NPRM and the ONC IFR
- General clinical informatics
- Emergency medicine physicians (in partnership with the American College of Emergency Physicians)
- Dietitians (in partnership with the American Dietetic Association)
No comments:
Post a Comment