This blog posting is a reading assignment for Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) medical students who will be attending a session I am leading in the Fundamentals block of their curriculum that introduces them to medicine and medical school. My goal for the session is to provide a high-level overview of the information-related issues and challenges they will deal with as physicians and in process introducing them to the field of clinical informatics.
Even though many medical students and physicians do not acknowledge it, information has always been a major focus of clinical practice . Physicians have always spent a great deal of time with information, as evidenced by studies that describe time use of physicians. Even in the era before widespread use of computers in medical practice, physicians spent more of their time in “indirect” care of patients (50-67%), including reviewing results and performing documentation, than directly interacting with patient (15-38%) [2-7]. A more recent study of interns found that they spent nearly 40% of their time in front of a computer .
Likewise, physicians and medical students have been using health information technology
(HIT) for decades. During this time, the role of HIT has changed dramatically from a useful tool for data access and occasional information retrieval to a ubiquitous presence that permeates healthcare and medical practice in myriad ways. Twenty-first century physicians face a much more information-intense world than their predecessors. The field that focuses on how information is acquired, stored, and used is called informatics
, and when applied in medicine and other health-related disciplines is called biomedical and health informatics
Why do physicians spend so much time dealing with information? One reason is that the quantity of biomedical knowledge continues to expand, with an attendant increase in the primary scientific literature, i.e., the 75 clinical trials and 11 systematic reviews published each day.  Secondary knowledge sources that summarize this information proliferate as well, not only for use by clinicians but also by patients and consumers. Medical knowledge no longer is the exclusive purview of physicians, as 80% of all Internet users have searched for personal health information .
Another major change in the use of HIT has been the rapid growth of electronic health record
(EHR) adoption. As a result of the “meaningful use” financial incentives of the Health Information for Technology and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act [12, 13], there has been widespread adoption and use of the EHR, growing to 97% in hospitals  and 78% in physician offices . Being able to use data and information also means understanding that the EHR is more than “charting,” and that its value goes beyond being able to read it. Clinicians must be facile with all aspects of the EHR, being able to easily move from one vendor system to another. They must also learn to take advantage of clinical decision support that aims to prevent errors in test ordering, prescribing, and other activities that improve diagnosis and treatment of patients .
There is also growing adoption of HIT by patients and consumers, who not only want to find information about their health and disease, but also desire to interact with the healthcare system the same way they interact with airlines, banks, and retailers, i.e., through digital means. Growing numbers of patients are participating in their care using technologies such as the personal health record
(PHR)  and some are even accessing their own progress notes  and more .
In the meantime, those who purchase and pay for healthcare, along with patients, are demanding more accountability for the quality, safety, and cost of care [20, 21]. This has led to an expectation of measurement and reporting of healthcare quality of care as a routine part of participation in new care delivery mechanisms such as primary care medical homes and accountable care organizations . Likewise, there is a growing application of the data analytics
to improving healthcare .
Patients may receive care in different places, sometimes by choice but other times by circumstances beyond their control, such as emergencies. Ideally data should “follow the patient” and move readily across organizational boundaries via health information exchange
(HIE) . At the same time, telemedicine
applications extend the reach of healthcare systems and clinicians in both rural and urban settings .
The growing quantity of clinical and administrative data in clinical information systems also affords an opportunity for advanced analysis that can enable better deployment of resources and coordination of care, facilitate personalized and precision medicine, and advance clinical and translational research . Together, these advances are moving healthcare toward the global vision of the learning health system
, where information systems are used to capture our practice, analyze what we might have done correctly or improperly, and guiding our improvement [27, 28].
Further evidence for importance of these developments comes the recent establishment of the new medical subspecialty of clinical informatics
. Practicing physicians are now beginning to become board-certified in this new subspecialty, with the concomitant establishment of fellowship programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). A growing number of physicians hold titles such as Chief Medical Informatics Officer (CMIO).
It should be abundantly clear that information becomes very different when one transitions to becoming a healthcare professional. There are professional and legal expectations that clinicians must acquire, analyze, and evaluate different facets of information to provide the best possible care to individual patients and entire populations. One critical concept is that informatics is not the same as computer literacy. Computer literacy is one of many requirements to use informatics successfully, but knowing how to use a computing device (PC, tablet, or smartphone) is not the same as having skills in informatics, i.e., using that device to improve health, healthcare delivery, public health, or research.
As a physician, information is different in many ways. Critical decisions about patient care are based on information not only in their EHR, but also knowledge retrieved from scientific literature, textbooks, Web sites, and other sources. Information must be accurate, up-to-date, and applied properly. Physicians must also be effective stewards of a patient’s record, both in terms of keeping it accurate and up-to-date, and also doing the utmost to make sure it is kept private and secure.
1. Shortliffe EH, Biomedical informatics in the education of physicians. Journal of the American Medical Association
, 2010. 304: 1227-1228.
2. Ammenwerth E and Spötl HP, The time needed for clinical documentation versus direct patient care. A work-sampling analysis of physicians' activities. Methods of Information in Medicine
, 2009. 48: 84-91.
3. Tipping MD, Forth VE, Magill DB, Englert K, and Williams MV, Systematic review of time studies evaluating physicians in the hospital setting. Journal of Hospital Medicine
, 2010. 5: 353-359.
4. Kim CS, Lovejoy W, Paulsen M, Chang R, and Flanders SA, Hospitalist time usage and cyclicality: opportunities to improve efficiency. Journal of Hospital Medicine
, 2010. 5: 329-334.
5. Tipping MD, Forth VE, O'Leary KJ, Malkenson DM, Magill DB, Englert K, et al., Where did the day go?--a time-motion study of hospitalists. Journal of Hospital Medicine
, 2010. 5: 323-328.
6. Yousefi V, How Canadian hospitalists spend their time - a work-sampling study within a hospital medicine program in Ontario. Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
, 2011. 18: 159-164.
7. Victores AJ, Coggins K, and Takashima M, Electronic health records and resident workflow: A time-motion study of otolaryngology residents. Laryngoscope
, 2015. 125: 594-598.
8. Block L, Habicht R, Wu AW, Desai SV, Wang K, Silva KN, et al., In the wake of the 2003 and 2011 duty hours regulations, how do internal medicine interns spend their time? Journal of General Internal Medicine
, 2013. 28: 1042-1047.
9. Hersh W, A stimulus to define informatics and health information technology. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making
, 2009. 9: 24. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/9/24/
10. Bastian H, Glasziou P, and Chalmers I, Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Medicine
, 2010. 7(9): e1000326. http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1000326
11. Fox S and Duggan M, Health Online 2013
. 2013, Pew Internet & American Life Project: Washington, DC, http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Health-online.aspx
12. Blumenthal D, Wiring the health system--origins and provisions of a new federal program. New England Journal of Medicine
, 2011. 365: 2323-2329.
13. Blumenthal D, Implementation of the federal health information technology initiative. New England Journal of Medicine
, 2011. 365: 2426-2431.
14. Charles D, Gabriel M, and Searcy T, Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems among U.S. Non-Federal Acute Care Hospitals: 2008-2014
. 2015, Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC, http://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/data-brief/2014HospitalAdoptionDataBrief.pdf
15. Hsiao CJ and Hing E, Use and Characteristics of Electronic Health Record Systems Among Office-based Physician Practices: United States, 2001–2013
. 2014, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Hyattsville, MD, http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db143.htm
16. Sittig DF, Wright A, Osheroff JA, Middleton B, Teich JM, Ash JS, et al., Grand challenges in clinical decision support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics
, 2008. 41: 387-392.
17. Miller HD, Yasnoff WA, and Burde HA, Personal Health Records: The Essential Missing Element in 21st Century Healthcare
. 2009, Chicago, IL: Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society.
18. Delbanco T, Walker J, Darer JD, Elmore JG, Feldman HJ, Leveille SG, et al., Open Notes: doctors and patients signing on. Annals of Internal Medicine
, 2010. 153: 121-125.
19. Woods SS, Schwartz E, Tuepker A, Press NA, Nazi KM, Turvey CL, et al., Patient experiences with full electronic access to health records and clinical notes through the My HealtheVet Personal Health Record Pilot: qualitative study. Journal of Medical Internet Research
, 2013. 15(3): e65. http://www.jmir.org/2013/3/e65/
20. Berwick DM, Nolan TW, and Whittington J, The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Affairs
, 2008. 27: 759-769.
21. McDonald KM, Chang C, and Schultz E, Closing the Quality Gap: Revisiting the State of the Science - Summary Report
. 2013, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Rockville, MD, http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/496/1375/ClosingtheQualityGap_SummaryReport_20130109.pdf.
22. Longworth DL, Accountable care organizations, the patient-centered medical home, and health care reform: what does it all mean? Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
, 2011. 78: 571-589.
23. Hersh WR, Healthcare Data Analytics
, in Health Informatics: Practical Guide for Healthcare and Information Technology Professionals, Sixth Edition
, Hoyt RE and Yoshihashi A, Editors. 2014, Lulu.com: Pensacola, FL. 62-75.
24. Kuperman GJ, Health-information exchange: why are we doing it, and what are we doing? Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
, 2011. 18: 678-682.
25. Kvedar J, Coye MJ, and Everett W, Connected health: a review of technologies and strategies to improve patient care with telemedicine and telehealth. Health Affairs
, 2014. 33: 194-199.
26. Safran C, Bloomrosen M, Hammond WE, Labkoff SE, Markel-Fox S, Tang P, et al., Toward a national framework for the secondary use of health data: an American Medical Informatics Association white paper. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
, 2007. 14: 1-9.
27. Friedman CP, Wong AK, and Blumenthal D, Achieving a nationwide learning health system. Science Translational Medicine
, 2010. 2(57): 57cm29. http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/2/57/57cm29.full
28. Smith M, Saunders R, Stuckhardt L, and McGinnis JM, Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America
. 2012, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
29. Detmer DE and Shortliffe EH, Clinical informatics: prospects for a new medical subspecialty. Journal of the American Medical Association
, 2014. 311: 2067-2068.